I should be able to resume posting shortly.

Video: Three Natural Laws of Security is currently unavailable. Seeking new hosting site.

2010-06-27

A pedal-powered sub ...
Surveillance camera images of the robbery suspect show a dapper older gentleman wearing a white newsboy cap, sunglasses and a crisp, white button-down shirt.
I wonder why they don't show the video instead of vidcaps. It's hard to imagine him exposing his face that way and not getting fingered ... unless it's a mask, in which case, showing how he walks may help someone identify him.

2010-06-24

The depravity of the assailants is incredible ... what do you tell your buddies ... "Ooh, did you see how after he was completely unconscious and defenseless I was able to work up the courage to sneak back in and hit him in the face with that stanchion" ... "I'm a veritable 8-year-old-girl of manliness, now" ... "I wish I'd have thought to sissy-kick his shins" ...
This is a really good idea. It's hard to be invisible to an enemy that can operate in what amounts to a parallel universe where they can approach to within killing distance of you without you even knowing that they're there ...

2010-06-22

Something to keep in mind

It's worth remembering that there are folks that do nothing but go around looking for other people's errors that they can exploit for profit, and then exploiting those errors.

The best way to avoid making exploitable errors is to be mindful of what you're doing and to think things through.

Don't ask yourself how likely a bad outcome is  to occur without also asking yourself how high the price will be IF that bad outcome occurs.

And don't ask yourself what's awaiting you on the other side without also asking yourself what you deserve to have awaiting you on the other side ...
Sounds like they do things a little differently there ...
All security measures follow this pattern ...

2010-06-19

No way out ...

Security interaction with subject in the bar ...
I'm going to limit my comments to the first of the three videos. It's always risky to assume too much from any particular segment of surveillance video, but I think a few comments are in order.

It looks like the subject has been playing some video poker and having a few beers. It then looks like he had a flash of anger at having lost the last of his credits. In anger, he slams his beer bottle down on the counter and then probably demands another from the bartender. The bartender realizes that the subject has had enough (and probably had enough prior to drinking the beer that occupied the bottle he just slammed on the bar). The bartender then likely told the subject that he would be happy to serve him a cup of coffee, which didn't fly with the subject so the bartender called for Security. In that the subject didn't put the bottle through the CRT, Security should, at this point, just be wanting the subject to 'call it a night' and go home or to some other property (or anywhere he will no longer be a problem for them).

1) The officers keep a good distance from the subject until there are enough of them to ensure the outcome (They keep their invisibility fairly high relative to the subject until they've marshaled their invincibility).

2) The first officer contacts the bartender and makes sure he knows what's going on before they approach the suspect (This is also an invisibility move but this time it's making sure that they're acting in a manner that will keep them invisible relative to the casino big-shots, the prosecutor and/or the contingency attorneys).

3) The officers then approach the subject and tell him to set down the bottle and call it a night. This is where it appears that they may have made an error. The officers need the subject to leave , but they leave no adequate opening for the subject to leave through (if they intended to detain the subject from the get-go, the officers would have been quite a bit more tensed up on the approach rather than being all relaxed and waiting to see how this one was going to go, and there wouldn't have  been any need for all the discussion).

Upon being ordered to leave the premises, there is no direction that the subject can go in that won't result in him going TOWARD a Security Officer. Under the circumstances, the subject is going to feel that doing such would most certainly be perceived by the Security Officers as provocative.

This is not some obscure technical consideration.

The subject is now drunk and no doubt frightened because of all the uniformed attention he's suddenly getting. The fear will have dumped adrenaline into his system and this flood of adrenaline will have narrowed his perception of available options to three: fight, flight or freeze.

The Security Officers have sufficient numbers to ensure victory, so fighting isn't a valid option, and they've formed a half circle around him with the bar blocking the other 180deg so there is no way for him leave without it looking like he's starting to fight, so flight isn't a valid option. All that's left is freezing, or standing still, and that's what he does. Security apparently takes that as recalcitrant non-compliance rather than fearfulness and proceed to detain him (never assume that smack-talking precludes fearfulness, it doesn't).

Had they formed a quarter circle around him with an obvious opening in the direction they wanted him to go, it's possible that the detainment and everything that took place afterward could have been avoided.

The Security Officer's concern about the beer bottle they refer to in the subsequent video is most likely concern that the bottle will be thrown through a window or something rather than concern that it will be used on one of them.  I say this because when they approach him they're close enough to prevent him from breaking it and then cutting one of them, too close to avoid being hit if he uses it for a striking weapon and not close enough to prevent him from using it that way. The urge to throw it through something can normally be suppressed by having an 'interceptor' out in the general direction you want the subject to go in so he knows he won't get away if he does throw it, but not close enough for his movement in that direction to feel like it will be perceived as threatening.

Caveat: Despite having participating in hundreds of this sort of Op, I could still be misreading this one. Don't take any of what I say here as criticism of the Security Officers or their performance. SecOps tend to have a life of their own and don't always go according to the nearly non-existent text-books. I offer these comments strictly to provoke thought about some less obvious aspects of our craft.

2010-06-18

Smash and grab

With full-size fireproof safes available for $2-300, it's unlikely that the registers contained the previous days receipts. It's more likely the money in the registers was the next day's opening bank and was likely between $50 and $100. Each owner lost a window and a cash register because they didn't have a system for providing the opening employee with a fresh bank that didn't involve leaving it in the till. At closing, the register should be left with the drawer open and the empty tray standing up in view of the front windows; not to protect the opening bank that you would otherwise leave in the cash register, but to protect the much more expensive cash register and windows.
Amazing how she panicked and then her and her friends executed a near-textbook team pick-pocketing operation ...
Hmmm ... sounds like someones spidey senses were tingling ...

2010-06-08

He'll be dealing with the ramifications for a good long time, but he IS still alive to deal with them ...
As Instapundit would say: Faster, please. 8O)

Naxal watch

Not usually ...

Whoa, whoa, WHOA ... no one ever said anything about there being red ultras in the forest ... I'm outta here ...
Hmmm ... haven't really heard anything about this ...

2010-06-04

Hmmm ... not much of a threat, he's not even wearing a mask ...

2010-06-02


 And while we're on the subject ...
The Principle's methodology seem to be fairly restrained and it's pretty obvious that the student knew he was in trouble and was trying to evade the Principal rather than just minding his own business and getting attacked. Whether the principal's actions were appropriate will depend on what led up to it (and possibly what happened in the little room out of camera view), but the Principal's actions that are seen on the video seemed to be well within the scope of his duty to maintain order in his school.
On an alternative possibility, that of the Cheonan being sunk by a mine, he explained, "The laying of an influence mine is extremely difficult, and the explosive power of a mine is more than 5 times that of a torpedo. So, judging by the destroyed Cheonan, the possibility of this being the cause is very low." In any case, Lee is totally convinced by the marking, “1-beon” on the torpedo drive shaft, saying it is a normal thing in North Korea and represents irrefutable evidence of his nation’s culpability. He commented, “In North Korea, even torpedoes are repaired by hand. For maintenance, a torpedo needs to be disassembled then checked for defects, rust must be removed, and other maintenance done. When a torpedo is being disassembled, sometimes a part can be lost or confused with another part of another torpedo. That is why they mark them with numbers and assemble them accordingly. The same method is used when they repair the detonator on an influence torpedo. The torpedo detonator only weighs about three kilograms, yet still it is disassembled and reassembled. So, it must be numbered several times.”
Very interesting assertions ...

Thai watch

2010-06-01

I think this is probably inaccurate because I doubt Israel is planning on letting it go that far ...
As usual, I agree with Bruce on this one ...
It DOES look pretty cool, but I don't think it bodes well for whatever passes for bear sanity ...

Philippine watch

Hmmm ... certainly didn't see that coming ... did we ...?

Jamaica watch

For those that have been following the news, Jamaica has been going through a lot of violence as the authorities there try to find Christopher Coke. As the numbers rise daily on the number of people who have died in the gun fights between the government and the gangs, it prompts a question that many people often wonder whenever there is gun violence: do gun bans actually limit the number of crimes committed with a gun? When trying to answer that question, it is important to look at the numbers. Jamaica, despite the numerous killings going on right now, normally has 60 murders for every 100,000 people a year. For a small island of only 3 million people, that’s a lot of yearly murders. But, what is interesting to note is that before the 1974 handgun ban in Jamaica, there were far fewer murders. But, when the guns were taken out of the hands of law abiding citizens, suddenly something very serious happened…

Gaza watch

Embedded videos of the action as the IDF boarded Mavi Marmara with paintball guns and holstered sidearms...

The video makes it look like the peace activists new the IDF was trying to do things all civilized-like and they  decided to take advantage of it. Hmmm ... must have forgotten that next time IDF might bring Uzis ...
Space is a very hostile environment. Congrats for sending it out and it lasting as long as it did ...

Naxal watch

DOH!