I should be able to resume posting shortly.

Video: Three Natural Laws of Security is currently unavailable. Seeking new hosting site.

2009-11-11

And the citizens don't count, so ...
When the 5.7 round was designed around the P-90, is was designed for military applications and as such has an armor piercing round. The round is not available to the public, nor is it available to individual officers or members of the military without the proper paperwork. So exactly what is the media talking about? Or is it more like hype over guns? Facts tend to mean little to nothing to liberals and the media. Lets look at a couple facts. The first one is that the FN Five Seven pistol will now be on some kind of “hit”  list for the anti gun crowd. Second, the only round that makes the 5.7 ammunition able to penetrate soft body armor is the SS 190 round. This round is not open for sale to the public, yes maybe a few boxes from years ago have drifted out, but you can’t buy it any more. Third, this pistol is really not that popular. Dealers have them for weeks at a time, some times months before they sell them. They are expensive and large, no real leather gear for daily carry  is available for the weapon and the cost of the ammo is high. Its just not a very big seller. I have go back to the range every year to re qualify, this is the first time I have seen someone show up with the Five Seven.  Hundreds of private and public officers and this was the first one who had the pistol. The pistol itself holds a 20 round magazine, not much more than a normal 9mm, which I am sure will be brought up as it was part of the ill fated Clinton assault weapons ban.

1000th post ...

This should reorient some utils toward actual flight security ...

2009-11-10

Gee, I sure hope everyone doesn't think that the weapon being used is always, or even occasionally, the weapon of choice. It almost never is. It is usually merely expedient ...
ABC News and the Telegraph (and, yes, even Brady once again, recycling the term and misleading claims they did so much to create) are once again reveling in articles shouting about the evil power contained in Major Hasan’s “cop killer” gun. But the simple fact of the matter is that there is good reason to believe that at least some of those wounded in Thursday’s shooting are alive today because of the 5.7 cartridge’s dubious capabilities. It may seem counterintuitive to many, but the high velocities that enable the Five-seveN’s .22 bullet to drive through soft body armor are thought to be mostly wasted on unarmored targets. The 5.7 is a relatively new cartridge with limited distribution and so actual “real world” ballistic performance is anecdotal at best, but high-velocity pistol bullets like the .38 Super noted earlier and the 7.62×25 Tokarev have been around almost 80 years. Their established track record is that of bullets with excellent penetration characteristics but with questionable stopping power. The 5.7 round uses a far lighter bullet at higher velocities and the high velocity gives the bullet the distinct possibility of fragmenting. But even then, a high-velocity bullet that only weighs 40 grains (as does the legal SS197SR bullet Hasan used) is at a distinct disadvantage when compared to other pistol cartridges. Instead of dumping the bullet’s energy into the body of the person shot, these high-velocity rounds typically stab a long narrow wound channel completely through a human-sized target, or they erupt into fragments that cause narrow wound channels.

2009-11-08

I find the decision to charge Sanchez with murder to be about as unreasonable as it gets. Sanchez was not an aggressor, was in a place that he had a right to be, and only used his gun to save himself from an imminent threat of death or grievous bodily harm. This was clearly a cut and dry self defense case. In this case, Sanchez saw a crime being committed. Apparently understanding that vigilantism is wrong and illegal, Sanchez did the right thing by calling 911 and attempting to get the criminal’s license plate number, so that he could give that information to the police. He was fully within his rights as a citizen to call 911, follow a vehicle, and report its license plate number. Note that Sanchez had a gun this whole time, but did not use it or even attempt to confront the criminals - he obeyed the law and did not try to take justice into his own hands. Upon seeing that Sanchez was recording their license plate number, the criminals then stopped their vehicle,got out, came over to Sanchez's vehicle, and began to attack him. Sanchez showed great restraint in not using his gun after one of the criminal broke his window and begin to beat him about the face. It was only when Sanchez (quite reasonably) feared for his life as the criminal tried to drag him from his truck that he fired in self defense.

I smell some folks needing voted out ...
Hmmm ...
Space life-boats?!?!? Why wasn't I informed ...
Police say that at about 11:30AM, two men jumped out of a slowly moving Ford Explorer then kicked in the front door of a home on the 4400 block of Shackleford St.  The resident, whose home had been repeatedly burglarized and vandalized by gang graffiti, grabbed his self defense gun.  The homeowner reportedly opened fire on the intruders, fatally wounding one and seriously injuring the other.  The homeowner was unharmed, and the surviving suspect was taken to a local hospital.  Police believe the same two home invaders may have been behind another burglary attempt that morning, which ended when that homeowner opened fire on the burglars and they fled in a similar-looking Ford Explorer. Criminals often work in groups, using superior numbers to overwhelm their victims.  When that happens, even the strongest unarmed victims can be overpowered by the numerically superior criminals.
Christmas is coming ...
Being a hothead is getting to be dangerous ...
What, exactly, makes the Five-Seven different from other handguns? The Five-Seven is chambered for the 5.7 x 28mm cartridge, ammunition originally developed by FN Herstal for the FN P90 Personal Defense Weapon. The P90 was conceived as a compact, powerful weapon that could be carried by aircraft crews, vehicle drivers and other troops who needed a weapon that was smaller than a carbine but larger than a pistol.
That certainly clears things up ...

2009-11-07

The most common form of combat has been the ambush. The Afghans have used this tactic for thousands of years. The availability of modern explosives has made the roadside bomb another powerful weapon for their ambushes. The prime targets for ambushes are targets that can provide the least resistance. In other words, supply convoys. Foreign troops have to devote enormous resources to protect these convoys. This has generally worked, but it means that about half the combat forces are occupied with this. Still, the effort does a lot of damage to the Taliban, for the enemy keeps trying to ambush the convoys, and American (and NATO) countermeasures (helicopter or UAV scouts, combat troops with the trucks and smart bombs always on call) have made such ambush operations higher risk than the Afghans are used to. The Russians, in the 1980s, were much easier targets. But the Russians didn't have the UAVs, and most of their troops were poorly trained conscripts.
Gotta love it ...
Helpful ...
Interesting ...

2009-11-05


Interesting ... too bad it isn't us ...
How about that ...
CIPS 2009 is not only a place for demonstrating the achievements in the development of rescue and fire safety equipment, but also a centre for sharing information, forming ideas and finding opportunities to combine efforts to counter the various threats to the public and industry. The exhibition is aimed at representatives of government bodies, the emergency services and road police departments, as well as managers of large, medium-sized and small businesses, and private individuals. CIPS provides an ideal platform for product promotion, brand development, market research, intra-industry communication between specialists, and meetings with potential customers. The exhibition will promote the development of various areas of the security industry, increased international cooperation, and improved security of the public, businesses and organisations. The exhibition will end on 7 November.
Sounds entertaining. Missed it this year, though ...
Check the legality of this stuff in your area ...

2009-11-04

Interesting point ...
I do soooo love it when they fight back ...
This is definitely a job for the private sector. With a variety of different approaches coming from a variety of different businesses, it will only be possible to compromise small sections of the cyber-structure at any one time. Interwebs, thy name is redundancy ...
So right ...
Probably ought to get something a little smaller fellas ...
Hmmm ... doesn't really sound that much like an ambush ...

Very interesting, let's start by focusing on means and forgetting about identity ...

2009-11-03

Cool video! Looks like excellent all-purpose training, but don't doubt for a second that you could get crippled if you don't take time to develop your skills ...

Generally applicable to everyone ...
Today's the day, everyday ...
Oh, that should work ...

2009-11-01

Hmmm ... I'm suspicious of what appear to be artifacts of masked wires ... very cool if true, though ...
Don't forget to encrypt your signal ... the Emperor's sword should only respond to the Emperor ...
That's easy to fix ...
Blam ... blam, blam ... I do SO love it when they fight back ...
Terrorism ... really ...?
That's what they're there for ..., but, nevertheless, very cool, if true ...
There are always additional steps you can take like using a network-isolated machine for all the work and then moving pre-encrypted files with a thumb-drive to the network machines, etc., but it will always be a question of how much inconvenience you're willing to endure to ensure your data is secure versus how much inconvenience the interferiors are willing to endure to compromise your data security. As long as you're willing to endure more inconvenience then they are, your data will normally remain secure ...
Hmmm ...

2009-10-31

Hmmm ...
I have served on the Senate Intelligence Committee for eight years, and I have yet to see evidence -- classified or otherwise -- that has convinced me that revising the business records provision to include a less intrusive standard would be harmful to U.S. national security. Yet as Congress considers whether to reauthorize this standard -- written in a rush to judgment eight years ago -- some will undoubtedly argue that Congress should just trust that the provision is essential and blindly sign-off on reauthorization. I disagree. While "just trust us" has passed as informed national security debate in this country for eight years, it hasn't resulted in good national security policy. Indeed, the shortage of serious discussion of intelligence matters has frequently resulted in counterterrorism programs that are much less balanced and effective than they could and should be.
So true ...

2009-10-29

A Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force (MSDF) destroyer on Wednesday successfully shot down a medium-range mock ballistic missile in a test off Hawaii, the Defense Ministry said. In the drill conducted in cooperation with the US Navy, the ballistic missile was launched from a US military range facility on Kauai Island. Four minutes later, the MSDF's Myoko, equipped with the Aegis advanced missile tracking system, detected the target and fired a sea-based Standard Missile 3 (SM-3). The US-made interceptor hit the target more than 100 kilometers above the Pacific Ocean three minutes later after launching. The ministry said the successful missile test proved the effectiveness of Japan's missile defense system, adding that it plans to complete the system by March 2011. The drill was Japan's third attempt to test-fire high-tech SM-3 interceptors. The nation successfully conducted its first SM-3 test in 2007, but the second attempt last year failed when the interceptor lost track of the target.
Interesting ...
Hit and git ... what's not to love ...
In recent weeks, with active shooter events having occurred at a mall, a church and as children got off a school bus, I’ve seen some postings in various online forums from civilians who hold concealed carry permits asking, “How should we react to this?” The question they are asking, in general, is what they should be doing if they’re on the scene and the shooting starts. I was at first conflicted as to how to answer this question. Then, having developed an answer, I strongly prefaced it with “this is just my opinion”. There are far too many “what if”s that come into play when considering a response to an active shooter - even for police officers who are off duty. Those “what if”s multiply ten fold for a civilian who is legally armed and happens to be on hand when a shooting starts. What to do?
Hmmm ...
I think it's a mistake to think of them as a weapon of choice. IEDs are always a weapon of expediency. If the extremists can get better funding, you can bet they'll buy some factory explosives from somewhere ...
Doesn't sound like a very long-term solution ...
A standalone Internet camera with advanced built-in software, the Mole provides auto-configuration so that the user can set up the camera in just a few easy steps and access their video privately without any network knowledge. Once set up, the Mole allows users to adjust the pan remotely to change the view instantly. While easy-to-use and affordable, the Mole camera includes high-end features such as motion detection activation, night vision, two-way audio, and a built-in DVR. The Mole also features both Ethernet or Wi-Fi connectivity. The Mole is designed for direct access from any web browser, which lets users watch their video instantly, from anywhere, including the iPhone. The on-board software is specifically tailored for seamless Internet sharing, including auto-uploads to YouTube. Users can also choose to receive real-time alerts via email or Twitter, sent to their mobile phone or any IP-enabled device.Available in early November 2009, the Mole will be distributed through Astak's network of retail and distribution partners, including Fry's Electronics, Costco, NewEgg.com, Amazon.com, Walmart.com and Astak.com, with an MSRP of $299.00.
It's probably stopping anyone from using the driveway ...
This, if true, is the classic mark of a security operation that is more or less permeable depending on an entrant's place in the pecking order. If the security officer delays the Secretary General (or someone else high up in the pecking order), he will get in trouble or fired or some other undesirable outcome, so the officer makes sure that he/she doesn't execute the security routine when the Secretary General comes through. Because the security officers are always deciding whether to execute the routine or not, when something they don't really understand come along they tend to error on the side of the entrant being high up ("What the hell is Colonel Sanders doing here ... I don't know but it's probably important. We better walk him through!") It would never happen in an operation where everyone goes through the exact same vetting process, regardless of who they are, prior to be allowed through a particular checkpoint.

2009-10-28

I wonder whose security they're hoping to enhance, presumably not the folks they're planning to search ...
This might be interesting if you have an iPhone ...
Police say that 69 year old Peter Gilmore was at his Port Charlotte, FL home, along with his 25 year old son James.  At about 10 PM, there was a knock on the front door, which Peter went to answer.  A pair of masked home invaders, armed with a knife and a tire iron, are said to have kicked the door open and rushed inside.  One of the robbers reportedly held a large knife to Peter's face, and threatened to kill him.  James reportedly ran to his father's bedroom, where they kept their firearms, with the tire iron wielding intruder in hot pursuit.  After grabbing a handgun and pointing it at the intruder, James told the intruder to leave, at which point the criminal refused and hit him in the head with a tire iron, according to police.  James then reportedly shot the violent home invader in the stomach, prompting him and his accomplice to flee.  Police reportedly apprehended both suspects, Keith Sowers and Joshua Eugene Becerril, shortly after the home invasion.  The injured suspect, Sowers, was listed in serious condition but is expected to live to face charges.
Hmmm ...

2009-10-25

Today's the day, every day, part deux ...
Kind of like a testimonial, huh ... ?
Today's the day, every day ...
Hmmm ... the interwebs will have gone through about 8 cycles of becoming unrecognizable to the previous cycle by then ... must be a really cool plan ...
Was he threatening to hold his breath 'til he turned blue, or what. A few details would be useful, here ...
Is there anything that isn't terrorism ...?

It is critically important that one kill ones own ego if one is going to engage in violent training or employment.  If you don't, you will eventually end up publicly humiliated, incarcerated or dead ...

2009-10-24

Unfortunately, true ...
Can't wait to hear the rest of this story ...
Interesting speculation ...
How very predictable ...
Funny ...
Interesting ...

2009-10-22

Quite a bit of encryption stuff today ...
Hmmm ...
I'm not sure why he would get no time after pleading guilty. Maybe the judge was impressed that he actually had the discipline to self-enforce an encryption policy ...
Really, terrorism ...?
Hmmm ...

2009-10-21

Cool site ...
Today's the day, everyday ...
It should make it clear that it isn't your security that they're trying to improve ...
I am a firm supporter of the second amendment right to bear arms. In the state of Alabama there is one aspect where our second amendment rights are being heinously violated. The aspect I am referring to is the fact that it is illegal for people to openly carry a sword. Some prefer tazers, pepper spray, or pocket knives as a means of self-defense, but swords are simply not allowed. Why is it perfectly fine to have a concealed .44 magnum with a permit, but completely illegal to have a gladius on your belt? Why is it acceptable to own an AK-47 and a thousand rounds of ammunition in Alabama, but not acceptable to sell a fully sharpened sword? I support the right to own a gun for self-defense, but I personally detest them. So what am I supposed to carry to protect myself when the best alternative is illegal to carry in the streets? 
Interesting point ...
It's odd how many security companies turn out to be shady ...
As long as your still readily identifiable as Security and don't stink or anything, I don't see a problem ...

2009-10-20

As with so much of Security, "Don't assume" is a great starting place ...
It's hard to call without having been there. Security always has the home court advantage but the S/O that's doing the talking isn't really providing any information and he could have just as easily been talking a mile a minute about "Look the promoter has pulled the plug because things are getting explosive out there. The shows been canceled but if you step over here we can call the promoter, Look, I don't have any choice, the property managers have told us we have to trespass you and have you arrested if you try to go on, etc." DMX et al. appear to have come to a stop for some talk-talk, but all that's being said is "We're badder than you" which typically doesn't promote a positive outcome. Practitioners of the Security Craft should try to remember that the guy your messing with may be able to afford better attorneys than you can and there isn't anything that guarantees that you'll be dropped from the suit or that you'll prevail, so you should probably exhaust all the non-provocative and non-violent possibilities before moving on to name calling and so forth ...