I guess it comes down to whether the Security Officer did, in fact, know who he is or not. It doesn't sound like he did based on the audio, and if he didn't then he was doing the right thing by not letting him in. On the other hand, if he did know who he was and was just being functionary, then he pretty well disqualified himself from the job.
2010-12-30
That's really the problem ... cut off one head, five more grow back 'cuz there's money to be made ...
Also:
Also:
While drug violence spills into Texas from Mexico, a local state lawmaker is trying to hit cartels where it hurts the most — their supply.[caller.com]
2010-12-29
2010-12-28
Video included
It would be interesting to know how frequently, within the set of all weapon retention events, the perp goes for a cross-body approach such as seen in the video ...
Video included
This has been widely covered in the MSM but I'll put up this link as a refresher. The point of posting about this is to point out how questionable it was for the author to put up video about the airport security lapses without taking steps to ensure his own security first. Some editing, titles instead of voice-overs, some meta-data removal and an upload from an open wifi hotspot and the author would be sitting back enjoying the fracus rather than being the fracus ...
2010-12-22
2010-12-21
2010-12-19
Bumped
I received a couple of comments about this article that bear addressing.
Probably the most important aspect of this security failure is the fact that the traveler didn't 'realize' that his gun was in the bag. Also, when the red teams are conducting the tests referred to in the article, they know that there won't be any prison time or any other bad thing happen to them if they're caught. In both situations, the travelers aren't going to be giving off the cue's that would likely bring a TSA Officer's attention fully to the fore. It's easy to say "Oh, they should be fully focused on the screens the whole time they're on duty", and I agree that it would be nice if such were the case, but it just isn't ever going to happen. It's like driving down the highway. We really should be fully focused when we're out in our cars traveling 70-80 mph, but how often are we, really.
On the other hand, a traveler that 'knows' there are potentially going to be strongly negative repercussions for the items they choose to put in their bag is going to be fairly radiating cues that say "I'm your chance to be a hero, today!"
This shouldn't be construed as a defense of TSA, per se. Most of what they do is a waste of time and money. But one shouldn't assume that someone planning to go tango would be able to get through undetected just because someone that isn't planning such makes it through.
2010-12-18
Video included
This is mainly interesting because it serves to show how limited you are while you have a blam-blam in your paw. The minute you realize you're not going to be able to justify dropping the hammer, it becomes a real liability ...
2010-12-15
Video included
I would certainly like to see what's causing all the movement in the other room ... that's one hell of a long time to keep a life and death struggle going ... maybe it's just post-kill adrenalin-burn or something ...
2010-12-14
2010-12-13
2010-12-12
Video included
Hmmm ... quite professional, but the jump onto the counter looks like the body dynamic of a juvenile, probably no more than 16-17 ...
2010-12-11
Video included
Ahhh, your feather-duster technique is very good ... or I'm just an incredible wussy ...
2010-12-10
One of the defectors behind Openleaks is Daniel Domschelt-Berg, who quit Wikileaks after Assange released Iraq War documents without thoroughly redacting names. He told Assange in an online chat obtained by Wired: "You are not anyone's king or god, And you're not even fulfilling your role as a leader right now. A leader communicates and cultivates trust in himself. You are doing the exact opposite. You behave like some kind of emperor or slave trader."
2010-12-08
2010-12-07
2010-12-06
Video included
If it really only took 'a few seconds' to compromise the safe, then either the safe wasn't locked or it was an inside job. That just isn't enough time to open a safe without already knowing that the combo was pre-spun and ready for the last digit or that it wouldn't actually be locked to begin with ...
2010-12-05
Video included
Admittedly, the train was stopping anyway, but it does show a certain amount of wallendas ...
New START
Lately, any time the Dems are in a hurry, the peasants are about to get screwed ...
START II forbids each country from converting the hardware that was once used to launch nuclear missiles, either from land or submarine, into an interceptor that can be used in a missile defense system.No more SDI ...
2010-12-04
The action/adventure film THE WARRIOR’S WAY opens today in the US.I saw this today. Pretty good in a cartoon-ish sort of way ...
2010-12-03
2010-12-02
2010-12-01
Video included
It doesn't say whether he was one of the forty people that just cut in line at the front, or not ...
Who knows whether this article is true, factual, slanted, etc., but for the sake of argument we can take it at face value.
A gubmint that turns the communities of their poorest citizens into a war zone so that they can can eventually host bigger sports events, probably at the behest of its wealthiest citizens, may need to stop and consider what effect that created violence will have on those citizens. Might not those citizens take sufficient offense to this gubmint action, due to collateral damage that the recipients find less acceptable than the gubment apparently did, that they decide to to take steps to inflict punishment on those responsible? Furthermore, due to the asymmetrical force projection capabilities of the two parties, might not whatever form that punishment takes end up being directed at the weak part of the offending edifice instead of the strong part of it, i.e. at the wealthy citizens instead of the gubmint itself?
As a Security Dude, it isn't that rare to hear statements like "It all started when he hit me back.", but thinking that way usually results in getting to have the opportunity to learn the lesson at least one more time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)