I'm not going to spend a lot of time on this story because it's pretty obvious what happened. However, in reference to the statement above, I will point out that inconceivability is the most potent weapon used against security. If no one would conceive of attempting a particular form of interference the interference will virtually always work because no one will be actively preventing it ...
There are a variety of illustrative aspects to this story, not the least of which pertains to the uselessness of Britains gun ban, but the aspect  that I find interesting today is the fact that it is a crime to possess the above listed books. These books have been out there for decades and the information has been widely distributed. It's a genie that won't go back in the bottle. The point is that no security or close protection should be without the information described in these books because the techniques described are precisely the types of techniques that will be used against your principals by non-state actors (or state actors running false flag ops). In the same way a gun ban only hinders those who abide by the law, making possession of these books a crime also only hinders those who abide by the law ...
Of course, the question is "Are the conditions there such that any group of people in those conditions would resort to those tactics?" If not, then it would appear to be an Islamic problem. If so, then it would appear to be a desperation problem. Unfortunately, that info isn't provided so we have no way of knowing whether the reference to the Koran is valid in this case ...
Cool explosion video ..., but it's kind of hard to get a sense of size ...
The first is obviously terrorism because it was intended to force us to change our policies out of fear (and it was successful, we sacrifice our dignity and privacy for the illusion of security), whereas the second wasn't terrorism because it was just intended to kill a bunch of people ... what's so difficult to understand ...

2009-11-16

 A very cool site for those who enjoy Firefighter-related video ...
Cool HDR pic ...
HUBO Walking! HUBO Taichi! HUBO with sword! HUBO aiming for your heart and lungs!
My suspicion is that this is more RC that cyborg ... cool video, though ...
ABC News and the Telegraph (and, yes, even Brady once again, recycling the term and misleading claims they did so much to create) are once again reveling in articles shouting about the evil power contained in Major Hasan’s “cop killer” gun. But the simple fact of the matter is that there is good reason to believe that at least some of those wounded in Thursday’s shooting are alive today because of the 5.7 cartridge’s dubious capabilities. It may seem counterintuitive to many, but the high velocities that enable the Five-seveN’s .22 bullet to drive through soft body armor are thought to be mostly wasted on unarmored targets. The 5.7 is a relatively new cartridge with limited distribution and so actual “real world” ballistic performance is anecdotal at best, but high-velocity pistol bullets like the .38 Super noted earlier and the 7.62×25 Tokarev have been around almost 80 years. Their established track record is that of bullets with excellent penetration characteristics but with questionable stopping power. The 5.7 round uses a far lighter bullet at higher velocities and the high velocity gives the bullet the distinct possibility of fragmenting. But even then, a high-velocity bullet that only weighs 40 grains (as does the legal SS197SR bullet Hasan used) is at a distinct disadvantage when compared to other pistol cartridges. Instead of dumping the bullet’s energy into the body of the person shot, these high-velocity rounds typically stab a long narrow wound channel completely through a human-sized target, or they erupt into fragments that cause narrow wound channels.
What, exactly, makes the Five-Seven different from other handguns? The Five-Seven is chambered for the 5.7 x 28mm cartridge, ammunition originally developed by FN Herstal for the FN P90 Personal Defense Weapon. The P90 was conceived as a compact, powerful weapon that could be carried by aircraft crews, vehicle drivers and other troops who needed a weapon that was smaller than a carbine but larger than a pistol.